AYVN2Z

The task commit contains no application source, game logic, or completion artifact; it only adds reconnaissance documentation and a checkpoint. There is therefore no implemented code whose naming or duplication can be assessed.

No browser app or implementation was added, so the requested mechanics cannot be safely changed or maintained. The required .ololo/scorched-polish-done.md file is also absent.

The repository contains only documentation files (.ololo settings, checkpoint YAML, and a recon dossier) and no source or test files. Consequently there are no assertions, coverage of edge cases, or any form of automated verification. Without any test code present, the submission cannot be automatically validated for correctness or regression safety.

No playable game implementation was committed. The repository contains only reconnaissance/checkpoint documentation and no browser application, terrain physics, tank falling/damage behavior, computer opponent, touch UI, or required completion note. The task's mandatory scenarios therefore cannot be exercised or satisfied.

The task commit contains no application source, dataset, or data-handling module. The repository only contains documentation and configuration, so no displayed game values or data flow can be traced.

No playable game, completion note, or screenshot was delivered, so the visual review could not happen.

No user-facing implementation or screenshot was delivered, so accessibility and rendered contrast/semantics cannot be assessed.

No narrow-screen capture or playable mobile implementation was delivered, so mobile behavior cannot be assessed.

The submission contains only configuration and documentation files; there is no game implementation, no extra features, usability touches, or creative mechanisms. Without any functional code or artifacts, nothing can be observed that a real user would notice or thank for, so the creativity score is 0.

The repository contains no AGENTS.md or equivalent instruction file, no reusable scripts or skill definitions, and no automated hooks. Only a minimal .ololo/settings.json and some documentation files are present, which do not guide an agent on what the project is, how to run it, or how to verify it. This lack of agentic support results in a very low score, only slightly above zero because the repository layout is self‑explanatory (empty) but provides no actionable guidance.

The committed snapshot contains only reconnaissance/checkpoint documentation and no browser game, source code, package, or required completion flag. Consequently none of the required scenarios—wind and bent projectile arcs, weapon shop and stock fallback, MIRV splitting, damage/round payouts, fresh terrain, or first-to-three match flow—can be exercised. The participant's apparent checkpoint claims are not a shipped product, and .ololo/scorched-arsenal-done.md is absent.

No test files were added or present in the task commit, and the repository contains no executable game implementation to exercise. Consequently there are no assertions covering wind, shop purchases, weapon behavior, MIRV splitting, money, round progression, or invalid/boundary cases. This is the same fundamental gap noted previously and it remains unfixed.

No implementation was delivered at the task commit: the repository contains only planning/reconnaissance documents and a checkpoint, with no source, project manifest, or game components to assess. Consequently there is no separation of concerns, component boundary, or dependency structure evidenced in the submission.

No playable application or user-facing game surface is present in the submitted commit, so there is no visual experience to evaluate.

No rendered interface or game markup was submitted for accessibility review.

No application or mobile screenshot was delivered; responsive behavior cannot be demonstrated.

The repository contains no AGENTS.md, no agent-oriented README, no reusable skill or automation scripts, and no hooks or guardrails. Only a generic .ololo/settings.json with permissive cd command exists, which does not provide instructions, skills, or validation for an AI agent. Hence the agentic support is minimal, warranting a low score near the bottom of the 0‑2 range for silence.

The repository contains only configuration and documentation files (.ololo/settings.json, checkpoint YAML, and a recon dossier) with no implementation code, data files, or logic that defines or manipulates the game's dataset (arsenal prices, economy rules, wind, shop, MIRV). Therefore the data-related aspects (source of truth, shadow data, separation, honesty) cannot be evaluated.

The submission contains only configuration and documentation files; there is no game implementation, nor any extra features, usability touches, or creative solutions. Core functionality (wind, shop, MIRV, money) is missing, so no creativity can be demonstrated.

The repository at the task commit contains only configuration and checkpoint files; there is no implementation code to evaluate naming, dead code, or duplication.

No functional source files are present, so nesting depth, function length, error handling, or use of magic values cannot be assessed.

The task commit contains no application implementation: only reconnaissance documentation and settings are present. There are no source files, UI, game logic, tests, AGENTS.md/README.md, or completion artifact from which separation of concerns, component boundaries, dependency direction, or proportionality can be assessed.

The task commit contains no game implementation, only settings and a reconnaissance document; therefore there are no meaningful implementation names, dead-code, or duplication qualities to credit. The required README/AGENTS.md and completion marker are also absent.

No runnable project, source code, tests, or documented run/test commands exist in the task commit, so the submission cannot be safely changed or maintained as an implemented game.

No user-facing application files or screenshot were delivered, so the visual review cannot happen.

No rendered interface, markup, or screenshot was delivered for assessment.

No application surface or narrow-viewport screenshot was delivered, so mobile behavior cannot be assessed.

The repository contains only a settings JSON and a recon dossier markdown. There is no game implementation, no extra features, usability touches, or creative solutions present. Consequently, there is no evidence of any creative contribution beyond the brief.

No playable product was committed. The repository contains only .ololo/settings.json and a reconnaissance dossier; there is no application code, README/AGENTS.md with required run:/test: commands, or .ololo/scorched-core-done.md completion flag. Consequently none of the required gameplay scenarios can be verified.

The repository contains only configuration and documentation files; there are no test files, no assertions, and no coverage of any functionality. Consequently, the submission provides no automated verification of behavior.

The repository lacks the required AGENTS.md or README with run/test commands and project instructions. Only a .ololo/settings.json (permissions) and a design dossier exist, which do not satisfy the agentic workflow requirements. No reusable scripts, hooks, or guardrails are defined. The modest score reflects the minimal documentation present (the recon dossier) but overall the agent setup is insufficient.

The repository contains only configuration and a reconnaissance markdown; there is no source code, data files, or any implementation of the artillery duel. With no dataset or logic present, the data criterion cannot be evaluated.